<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Zend Framework review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/</link>
	<description>Ivo's blog about PHP, the internet and life in general</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ivo Jansch</title>
		<link>http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4391</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivo Jansch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansch.nl/?p=291#comment-4391</guid>
		<description>It's PHP5 only. they use features such as exception handling that are available only in PHP5. The bad thing about this is that only a fraction of hosting servers currently runs PHP5. The good thing about it though is that this may boost PHP5 acceptance and get more servers to run PHP5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->It&#8217;s PHP5 only. they use features such as exception handling that are available only in PHP5. The bad thing about this is that only a fraction of hosting servers currently runs PHP5. The good thing about it though is that this may boost PHP5 acceptance and get more servers to run PHP5.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jam</title>
		<link>http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>jam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansch.nl/?p=291#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>Zend Framework work only with PHP5 or PHP4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Zend Framework work only with PHP5 or PHP4?<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web.develop blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4371</link>
		<dc:creator>web.develop blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansch.nl/?p=291#comment-4371</guid>
		<description>On March 3rd, a first preview version of Zend Framework has been released to public.


  Zend Framework is a high quality and open source framework for developing Web Applications and Web Services.
  
  Built in the true PHP spirit, the Zend Framework ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->On March 3rd, a first preview version of Zend Framework has been released to public.</p>
<p>  Zend Framework is a high quality and open source framework for developing Web Applications and Web Services.</p>
<p>  Built in the true PHP spirit, the Zend Framework &#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 16:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansch.nl/?p=291#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with you, it is not currently a "framework" in the sense that people are looking for.

http://www.cyberlot.net/ZendFrameworkFirst

In its current stage it would be better off improving php code and adding to the pear libraries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I have to agree with you, it is not currently a &#8220;framework&#8221; in the sense that people are looking for.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cyberlot.net/ZendFrameworkFirst" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyberlot.net/ZendFrameworkFirst</a></p>
<p>In its current stage it would be better off improving php code and adding to the pear libraries.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten</title>
		<link>http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4351</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansch.nl/?p=291#comment-4351</guid>
		<description>Another thing that was already mentioned on the sitepoint-forums (not sure if it came up on the mailing lists yet), is the somewhat whacky implementation of the "is*"-methods:


public static function isFloat($value) 
    { 
        if (floatval($value) == $value) { 
            return $value; 
        } 

        return FALSE; 
    } 

You would expect the method to return either TRUE or FALSE, but not the passed argument itself. I really hope this will be changed in future releases.

And about the wrapper thing: It's fine to me if they wrap some of php native's functions, since an oo approach can provide a cleaner way of error-handling (such as throwing exceptions). So if they do not bloat the framework with it, it's okay to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Another thing that was already mentioned on the sitepoint-forums (not sure if it came up on the mailing lists yet), is the somewhat whacky implementation of the &#8220;is*&#8221;-methods:</p>
<p>public static function isFloat($value)<br />
    {<br />
        if (floatval($value) == $value) {<br />
            return $value;<br />
        } </p>
<p>        return FALSE;<br />
    } </p>
<p>You would expect the method to return either TRUE or FALSE, but not the passed argument itself. I really hope this will be changed in future releases.</p>
<p>And about the wrapper thing: It&#8217;s fine to me if they wrap some of php native&#8217;s functions, since an oo approach can provide a cleaner way of error-handling (such as throwing exceptions). So if they do not bloat the framework with it, it&#8217;s okay to me.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukas</title>
		<link>http://www.jansch.nl/2006/03/05/quick-zend-framework-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jansch.nl/?p=291#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>They are implementing the wrappers because they want to run on 5.0.x. Also its not like these guys have the ability to add any features they want in PHP. Making the file system functions include path aware was shot down my internals. I even provided patches to make it work :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->They are implementing the wrappers because they want to run on 5.0.x. Also its not like these guys have the ability to add any features they want in PHP. Making the file system functions include path aware was shot down my internals. I even provided patches to make it work <img src='http://www.jansch.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> <!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
